Services · Navigate

Innovation Support Navigation

Once a project has structure and evidence, wider support pathways may become relevant. We help you understand them — without promising outcomes.

When you need this

  • “People keep mentioning R&DTI, CRC, grants — what applies to us?” Advisers, investors and peers each name a different program, and you want a neutral explanation of what each one actually is before anyone starts filling in forms.
  • “Our project now has structure and records — what could that open up?” The pathway has been run and the evidence exists; the question is which support pathways may be relevant to a project shaped like yours.
  • “A pathway may need partners we don’t have yet.” Some programs require research collaboration partners and specific project structures, and you want to understand what preparation may be required before deciding whether to pursue one.
  • “We want to plan ahead without betting on an outcome.” You are not looking for promises — you want to know how structure, partners and evidence affect relevance so future decisions are informed ones.

What we deliver

  • Orientation across R&DTI, CRC-P, CRC and ARC Linkage
  • What preparation each pathway may require
  • How project structure, partners and evidence affect relevance
  • Orientation across R&DTI, CRC-P, CRC and ARC Linkage. A plain-language map of the main Australian innovation support pathways, what each is for, and how they differ — with links to the official sources.
  • What preparation each pathway may require. The kinds of structure, records and relationships each pathway may require — so if one becomes relevant later, the groundwork already exists.
  • How project structure, partners and evidence affect relevance. An explanation of how the way a project is structured, who is involved and what has been recorded shape which pathways may be relevant — and which are unlikely to be.

Every pathway is administered by the Australian Government, and each one may be relevant only depending on the project’s structure, partners and evidence. We always point you to the official sources — business.gov.au for the R&D Tax Incentive and CRC-P, the Department of Industry, Science and Resources for the CRC Program, and the Australian Research Council for the Linkage Program.

How it connects

This conversation lands best after the earlier steps — Assessment, Design, Documentation and Delivery — because relevance depends on the structure and evidence those steps produce.

For the pathways themselves, start with our Innovation Support Pathways hub, the R&D Tax Incentive guide and what a registered RSP is. Or see all services.

Boundaries

This service does not determine R&DTI eligibility and is not tax, legal or grant advice. We explain what each pathway is and what preparation may be required; we do not assess eligibility, prepare applications or predict outcomes. Decisions about any pathway rest with you and your registered advisers, against the current official guidance.

Want to understand the landscape before you commit to anything?

Tell us about your project and we will walk you through which pathways may be relevant to its structure — and what preparation each may require.

A researcher reads your enquiry, not a salesperson — and replies within two business days. That includes telling you when a research pathway is not the right tool.

Start a project assessment

Still early on the pathway? Check your project readiness in two minutes.

General information only — not tax, financial or legal advice. Whether any government support pathway may be relevant depends on your specific activities, evidence and circumstances, and the R&D Tax Incentive is self-assessed. Always confirm current rules with the Australian Government (business.gov.au, industry.gov.au and arc.gov.au) or a registered adviser.